https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459873 The court ruled that proceedings under Section 48 of the Competition Act, 2002, can commence before the CCI finds a contravention against a company, rejecting the petitioner's argument for separate proceedings for the company and its key-persons. The court distinguished the case from the Supreme Court's decision in Aneeta Hada, noting it did not apply to the Competition Act. It concluded that a single proceeding is appropriate, allowing key-persons to present defenses without prejudice. The CCI should proceed with its judgment and provide an opportunity for defense if a contravention is found. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:56:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459873 The court ruled that proceedings under Section 48 of the Competition Act, 2002, can commence before the CCI finds a contravention against a company, rejecting the petitioner's argument for separate proceedings for the company and its key-persons. The court distinguished the case from the Supreme Court's decision in Aneeta Hada, noting it did not apply to the Competition Act. It concluded that a single proceeding is appropriate, allowing key-persons to present defenses without prejudice. The CCI should proceed with its judgment and provide an opportunity for defense if a contravention is found. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459873