<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1387 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459876</link>
    <description>HC dismissed respondent&#039;s invocation of Book Examination Clause against petitioner supplier. Petitioner supplied SNS Assembly equipment per purchase orders worth Rs. 2.31 crores. Respondent invoked clause alleging abuse of dominant position under Competition Act Sections 3-4. CCI previously ruled no contravention of Section 4 by petitioner, finding no abuse of dominant position in pricing. NCLAT affirmed CCI&#039;s decision in 2020 and 2022. HC held respondent should have appealed to SC under Section 53T rather than unilaterally revising rates. CCI findings attained finality without SC challenge. Petition allowed, impugned orders set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1387 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459876</link>
      <description>HC dismissed respondent&#039;s invocation of Book Examination Clause against petitioner supplier. Petitioner supplied SNS Assembly equipment per purchase orders worth Rs. 2.31 crores. Respondent invoked clause alleging abuse of dominant position under Competition Act Sections 3-4. CCI previously ruled no contravention of Section 4 by petitioner, finding no abuse of dominant position in pricing. NCLAT affirmed CCI&#039;s decision in 2020 and 2022. HC held respondent should have appealed to SC under Section 53T rather than unilaterally revising rates. CCI findings attained finality without SC challenge. Petition allowed, impugned orders set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>