<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1330 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459878</link>
    <description>The Patna HC set aside the rejection of BVG India Limited&#039;s technical bid, finding it contrary to NIT Clause 2.2 which did not require internal audited balance sheet materials. The court also set aside the contract award to M/s Pashupatinath Distributors Private Limited, determining they failed to meet turnover and experience criteria under Clauses 2.2 and 2.3. The HC found the tendering authority&#039;s actions arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing fresh technical evaluation of remaining bidders including BVG India Limited and Ziqitza Healthcare Limited within two months. The petition was allowed with interim arrangements continuing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1330 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459878</link>
      <description>The Patna HC set aside the rejection of BVG India Limited&#039;s technical bid, finding it contrary to NIT Clause 2.2 which did not require internal audited balance sheet materials. The court also set aside the contract award to M/s Pashupatinath Distributors Private Limited, determining they failed to meet turnover and experience criteria under Clauses 2.2 and 2.3. The HC found the tendering authority&#039;s actions arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing fresh technical evaluation of remaining bidders including BVG India Limited and Ziqitza Healthcare Limited within two months. The petition was allowed with interim arrangements continuing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>