<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40009</link>
    <description>A firm assessed as a distinct taxable dealer under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 is liable for its own tax demand, and partners cannot be proceeded against for that arrears unless the statute expressly fastens joint liability on them. The Act also permits the Commissioner to choose between penalty and prosecution as alternative enforcement measures, and that discretion is not unguided where the statutory scheme channels it through hearing requirements, sanction, and the gravity of default. The text states that the scheme was upheld, while recovery against the partners for the firm&#039;s arrears was not legally available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40009</link>
      <description>A firm assessed as a distinct taxable dealer under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 is liable for its own tax demand, and partners cannot be proceeded against for that arrears unless the statute expressly fastens joint liability on them. The Act also permits the Commissioner to choose between penalty and prosecution as alternative enforcement measures, and that discretion is not unguided where the statutory scheme channels it through hearing requirements, sanction, and the gravity of default. The text states that the scheme was upheld, while recovery against the partners for the firm&#039;s arrears was not legally available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>