<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Deduction Upheld: ITAT Affirms AO&#039;s Well-Reasoned Order, Limits CIT&#039;s Revisionary Powers u/s 263.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84459</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against revision u/s 263 by the CIT. The AO had rightly allowed deduction u/s 57 after detailed inquiry. The CIT cannot substitute his view for the AO&#039;s well-reasoned order. Explanation 2(a) to Sec. 263 does not give unfettered revision powers. The AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Deduction Upheld: ITAT Affirms AO&#039;s Well-Reasoned Order, Limits CIT&#039;s Revisionary Powers u/s 263.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84459</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against revision u/s 263 by the CIT. The AO had rightly allowed deduction u/s 57 after detailed inquiry. The CIT cannot substitute his view for the AO&#039;s well-reasoned order. Explanation 2(a) to Sec. 263 does not give unfettered revision powers. The AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>