<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40003</link>
    <description>For sales tax purposes, an addition to taxable turnover on the basis of concealed sales requires positive material showing both that the amount is the firm&#039;s income and that it arose from transactions liable to sales tax. A mere unexplained cash credit standing in the name of a partner&#039;s wife, without further evidence linking it to undisclosed sales, is insufficient. The department cannot rely solely on the absence of a satisfactory explanation by the assessee, the partner, or the wife, because sales tax liability does not arise by presumption from unexplained money in the way sometimes seen in income-tax matters. The addition was therefore not sustainable, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40003</link>
      <description>For sales tax purposes, an addition to taxable turnover on the basis of concealed sales requires positive material showing both that the amount is the firm&#039;s income and that it arose from transactions liable to sales tax. A mere unexplained cash credit standing in the name of a partner&#039;s wife, without further evidence linking it to undisclosed sales, is insufficient. The department cannot rely solely on the absence of a satisfactory explanation by the assessee, the partner, or the wife, because sales tax liability does not arise by presumption from unexplained money in the way sometimes seen in income-tax matters. The addition was therefore not sustainable, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>