https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763951 A summons issued in proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act could not be quashed merely because the respondent had been discharged in the predicate offence. The discharge did not, by itself, defeat the summons at that stage, and the question whether the respondent should be arrayed as an accused was left open for later consideration if such a stage arose. The quashing of the summons was therefore unsustainable, and proceedings pursuant to the summons were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763951 A summons issued in proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act could not be quashed merely because the respondent had been discharged in the predicate offence. The discharge did not, by itself, defeat the summons at that stage, and the question whether the respondent should be arrayed as an accused was left open for later consideration if such a stage arose. The quashing of the summons was therefore unsustainable, and proceedings pursuant to the summons were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763951