<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763974</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08, deleting all additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The tribunal held that disallowances of prior period expenses, contributions to pension and gratuity funds, and treatment of upfront lease premium were not sustainable given the assessee&#039;s established entitlement to exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. All consequential levies were also deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763974</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08, deleting all additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The tribunal held that disallowances of prior period expenses, contributions to pension and gratuity funds, and treatment of upfront lease premium were not sustainable given the assessee&#039;s established entitlement to exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. All consequential levies were also deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>