<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39999</link>
    <description>The U.P. Agricultural Income-tax Act permitted direct assessment of individual partners on returns filed by them, because the statutory definitions made partners separately liable and section 18 did not create an exclusive bar requiring prior proceedings against the firm. The only constraint recognised was against taxing the same income twice; as no assessment had been made on the firm, that objection failed. The lands were also found, on the factual record, to be assessed to land revenue or subject to local rate or cess, satisfying the Act&#039;s condition. The assessment was therefore treated as valid and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39999</link>
      <description>The U.P. Agricultural Income-tax Act permitted direct assessment of individual partners on returns filed by them, because the statutory definitions made partners separately liable and section 18 did not create an exclusive bar requiring prior proceedings against the firm. The only constraint recognised was against taxing the same income twice; as no assessment had been made on the firm, that objection failed. The lands were also found, on the factual record, to be assessed to land revenue or subject to local rate or cess, satisfying the Act&#039;s condition. The assessment was therefore treated as valid and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>