https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763978 The HC dismissed the petition, concluding there was no violation of natural justice in the assessment order as the petitioner had been duly notified and represented. The court emphasized that the petitioner should exhaust statutory remedies, such as appealing to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), before invoking the court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal without the time spent in court affecting the limitation period for filing. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763978 The HC dismissed the petition, concluding there was no violation of natural justice in the assessment order as the petitioner had been duly notified and represented. The court emphasized that the petitioner should exhaust statutory remedies, such as appealing to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), before invoking the court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal without the time spent in court affecting the limitation period for filing. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763978