https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459841 The HC held that the writ petition is maintainable despite concurrent proceedings before the CCI, as it addresses issues such as promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, which fall within the court's jurisdiction and are not covered by the CCI. The doctrine of election of remedies does not apply. The court also allowed the amendment of the writ petition to challenge the MoU dated 1st February 2003, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution. However, the final decision on the writ petition is deferred until the CCI proceedings conclude to prevent conflicting decisions. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459841 The HC held that the writ petition is maintainable despite concurrent proceedings before the CCI, as it addresses issues such as promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, which fall within the court's jurisdiction and are not covered by the CCI. The doctrine of election of remedies does not apply. The court also allowed the amendment of the writ petition to challenge the MoU dated 1st February 2003, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution. However, the final decision on the writ petition is deferred until the CCI proceedings conclude to prevent conflicting decisions. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459841