<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1625 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459848</link>
    <description>The Competition Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on association office-bearers. The tribunal held that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) erred by investigating individual liability under Section 48 before determining that the association itself contravened competition law provisions. The CCI violated natural justice principles by not providing adequate notice before imposing penalties. Additionally, the tribunal ruled that the CCI&#039;s direction barring appellants from association affairs for two years exceeded its powers under Section 27(g), as it interfered with rights governed by the Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. The penalty and administrative restrictions were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1625 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459848</link>
      <description>The Competition Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on association office-bearers. The tribunal held that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) erred by investigating individual liability under Section 48 before determining that the association itself contravened competition law provisions. The CCI violated natural justice principles by not providing adequate notice before imposing penalties. Additionally, the tribunal ruled that the CCI&#039;s direction barring appellants from association affairs for two years exceeded its powers under Section 27(g), as it interfered with rights governed by the Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. The penalty and administrative restrictions were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>