<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1389 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459850</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging CCI&#039;s order impleading Builders Association of India in proceedings investigating cartelization and price manipulation by cement manufacturers. The court held that CCI properly exercised its power under Regulation 25, satisfying the conjunctive test of substantial interest and public interest. The petitioner&#039;s claims of procedural violations, inadequate reasoning, and breach of natural justice were rejected. The court found no ultra vires action regarding confidential information sharing, noting appropriate safeguards were maintained. The impleadment order was deemed legally sound and within CCI&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1389 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459850</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging CCI&#039;s order impleading Builders Association of India in proceedings investigating cartelization and price manipulation by cement manufacturers. The court held that CCI properly exercised its power under Regulation 25, satisfying the conjunctive test of substantial interest and public interest. The petitioner&#039;s claims of procedural violations, inadequate reasoning, and breach of natural justice were rejected. The court found no ultra vires action regarding confidential information sharing, noting appropriate safeguards were maintained. The impleadment order was deemed legally sound and within CCI&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>