<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1390 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459865</link>
    <description>HC found the tax notice and order invalid due to absence of signatures, violating Rule 26(3) of Central Board of Service Tax Rule 2017. Following prior precedents, the Court set aside the documents but granted Revenue liberty to re-issue proceedings legally. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1390 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459865</link>
      <description>HC found the tax notice and order invalid due to absence of signatures, violating Rule 26(3) of Central Board of Service Tax Rule 2017. Following prior precedents, the Court set aside the documents but granted Revenue liberty to re-issue proceedings legally. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>