<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39994</link>
    <description>A partition or relinquishment by a coparcener within two years of death, where he accepts less than his due share and the other coparcener gains the benefit, falls within the extended meaning of &quot;disposition&quot; under the Estate Duty Act. The deeming provisions enlarge &quot;property&quot; and &quot;disposition&quot; to cover extinguishment of rights to the extent of the benefit conferred, even without a conventional transfer under Hindu law. Bona fides are relevant to dispositions outside the two-year window, but dispositions within that period are caught by the charging scheme. The resulting benefit to the relative is therefore liable to estate duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39994</link>
      <description>A partition or relinquishment by a coparcener within two years of death, where he accepts less than his due share and the other coparcener gains the benefit, falls within the extended meaning of &quot;disposition&quot; under the Estate Duty Act. The deeming provisions enlarge &quot;property&quot; and &quot;disposition&quot; to cover extinguishment of rights to the extent of the benefit conferred, even without a conventional transfer under Hindu law. Bona fides are relevant to dispositions outside the two-year window, but dispositions within that period are caught by the charging scheme. The resulting benefit to the relative is therefore liable to estate duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>