<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service Tax on Cleaning Services for Railways Upheld; Appeal Partially Allowed, Case Remanded for Further Determination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84417</link>
    <description>Appellant liable to pay service tax on &#039;Cleaning activity&#039; services provided to Indian Railways and public sector undertakings as per Madras HC&#039;s decision in Premier Garment Process case. Service tax payable on gross amount including employee wages, unless appellant is pure agent as per Supreme Court&#039;s Intercontinental Consultants judgment. Secondary packaging activity not manufacturing, hence not under service tax. Transportation of documents and goods not &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039; service but &#039;Transportation of Goods&#039; under reverse charge. Appellant eligible for Notification No. 30/2012-ST benefit and cum-tax benefit u/s 67(2). Matter remanded to adjudication authority to quantify service tax liability on cleaning and manpower supply services for normal period, considering pure agent contracts, and allowing notification benefit. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service Tax on Cleaning Services for Railways Upheld; Appeal Partially Allowed, Case Remanded for Further Determination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84417</link>
      <description>Appellant liable to pay service tax on &#039;Cleaning activity&#039; services provided to Indian Railways and public sector undertakings as per Madras HC&#039;s decision in Premier Garment Process case. Service tax payable on gross amount including employee wages, unless appellant is pure agent as per Supreme Court&#039;s Intercontinental Consultants judgment. Secondary packaging activity not manufacturing, hence not under service tax. Transportation of documents and goods not &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039; service but &#039;Transportation of Goods&#039; under reverse charge. Appellant eligible for Notification No. 30/2012-ST benefit and cum-tax benefit u/s 67(2). Matter remanded to adjudication authority to quantify service tax liability on cleaning and manpower supply services for normal period, considering pure agent contracts, and allowing notification benefit. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>