https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865 An arbitration clause in the purchase agreement was sufficient to satisfy the limited referral inquiry under Section 11, so the court did not examine the respondent's objection that approval of the resolution plan in insolvency had extinguished the claim. That objection was treated as a merits issue for the arbitral tribunal, along with the effect of resolution-plan approval on liabilities. Limitation was found to be within time, and prior notices had not resolved the dispute amicably. The application was therefore allowed and a sole arbitrator appointed to decide the dispute. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865 An arbitration clause in the purchase agreement was sufficient to satisfy the limited referral inquiry under Section 11, so the court did not examine the respondent's objection that approval of the resolution plan in insolvency had extinguished the claim. That objection was treated as a merits issue for the arbitral tribunal, along with the effect of resolution-plan approval on liabilities. Limitation was found to be within time, and prior notices had not resolved the dispute amicably. The application was therefore allowed and a sole arbitrator appointed to decide the dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865