https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865 The Rajasthan HC confirmed the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties under a purchase agreement dated 28.07.2014 for copper supply. Despite the non-applicant company's resistance to arbitrator appointment citing subsequent events, the court found the arbitration clause in Clause 16(B) was undisputed. The court noted that Section 11(6A) remains in force as its omission through the 2019 Amendment Act was not officially notified. Following legal notices in 2021-2022 and the parties' failure to resolve disputes amicably, the court appointed a sole arbitrator and found the application within limitation. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865 The Rajasthan HC confirmed the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties under a purchase agreement dated 28.07.2014 for copper supply. Despite the non-applicant company's resistance to arbitrator appointment citing subsequent events, the court found the arbitration clause in Clause 16(B) was undisputed. The court noted that Section 11(6A) remains in force as its omission through the 2019 Amendment Act was not officially notified. Following legal notices in 2021-2022 and the parties' failure to resolve disputes amicably, the court appointed a sole arbitrator and found the application within limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763865