<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1454 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763874</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant&#039;s cleaning services to Indian Railway and public sector undertakings are subject to service tax liability. The demand invoking extended limitation period was unsustainable due to absence of willful suppression. Secondary packaging activity was classified as manufacturing, exempt from service tax. Transportation services fall under goods transportation with reverse charge on recipient. The matter was remanded to adjudication authority for quantification considering pure agent status and normal limitation period. Appellant entitled to notification benefits and cum-tax relief under Section 67(2) Finance Act, 1994. Appeal partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1454 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763874</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant&#039;s cleaning services to Indian Railway and public sector undertakings are subject to service tax liability. The demand invoking extended limitation period was unsustainable due to absence of willful suppression. Secondary packaging activity was classified as manufacturing, exempt from service tax. Transportation services fall under goods transportation with reverse charge on recipient. The matter was remanded to adjudication authority for quantification considering pure agent status and normal limitation period. Appellant entitled to notification benefits and cum-tax relief under Section 67(2) Finance Act, 1994. Appeal partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>