https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763879 The HC granted bail to the appellants, who had been in custody for over a year without charges being framed under the PMLA. The court applied precedent, noting the significant delay in trial proceedings and the substantial volume of evidence, concluding that continued detention was unjustified. The court also clarified the role of the Public Prosecutor, emphasizing their duty to act fairly and independently, particularly when trial delays are attributed to the conduct of the ED. The Public Prosecutor should not oppose bail solely due to ED-related delays but may do so on other grounds. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763879 The HC granted bail to the appellants, who had been in custody for over a year without charges being framed under the PMLA. The court applied precedent, noting the significant delay in trial proceedings and the substantial volume of evidence, concluding that continued detention was unjustified. The court also clarified the role of the Public Prosecutor, emphasizing their duty to act fairly and independently, particularly when trial delays are attributed to the conduct of the ED. The Public Prosecutor should not oppose bail solely due to ED-related delays but may do so on other grounds. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763879