<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1461 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763881</link>
    <description>Filing multiple writ petitions seeking identical reliefs before different High Courts, despite knowledge of earlier pending proceedings, was treated as an impermissible attempt to re-agitate the same cause. The Court found that repeating the same challenge after disclosing the earlier matters did not make the petition maintainable and amounted to an abuse of process. The writ petition was dismissed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1461 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763881</link>
      <description>Filing multiple writ petitions seeking identical reliefs before different High Courts, despite knowledge of earlier pending proceedings, was treated as an impermissible attempt to re-agitate the same cause. The Court found that repeating the same challenge after disclosing the earlier matters did not make the petition maintainable and amounted to an abuse of process. The writ petition was dismissed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>