https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763913 The HC set aside the impugned order requiring the petitioner to pay tax, interest, and penalty, citing a violation of the principles of natural justice and Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, as the petitioner was not granted a personal hearing. The court emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and adherence to statutory requirements. Consequently, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with conditions including a deposit by the petitioner and a mandated personal hearing. The decision indirectly affected the attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts, suggesting it was premature. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763913 The HC set aside the impugned order requiring the petitioner to pay tax, interest, and penalty, citing a violation of the principles of natural justice and Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, as the petitioner was not granted a personal hearing. The court emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and adherence to statutory requirements. Consequently, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with conditions including a deposit by the petitioner and a mandated personal hearing. The decision indirectly affected the attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts, suggesting it was premature. Case-Laws GST Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763913