<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1495 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763915</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted against a show-cause notice where the petitioner showed prima facie that the same subject matter had already been adjudicated by the appellate authority under the JGST regime. The Court found force in the contention that the issue could not be reopened at this stage, and stayed all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1495 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763915</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted against a show-cause notice where the petitioner showed prima facie that the same subject matter had already been adjudicated by the appellate authority under the JGST regime. The Court found force in the contention that the issue could not be reopened at this stage, and stayed all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>