<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1500 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763920</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under Section 83 expired after one year and was not continued by the competent authority. On the respondents&#039; statement that the attachment order had lapsed and that communications would be issued to the affected financial institution(s) confirming termination, the challenge to the attachment had become infructuous. The court therefore disposed of the petition and discharged the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1500 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763920</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under Section 83 expired after one year and was not continued by the competent authority. On the respondents&#039; statement that the attachment order had lapsed and that communications would be issued to the affected financial institution(s) confirming termination, the challenge to the attachment had become infructuous. The court therefore disposed of the petition and discharged the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>