https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763928 Premature rejection of a GST registration amendment application, before expiry of the time given to furnish additional documents, violated natural justice because it deprived the applicant of a fair opportunity to respond. The Delhi HC found that the notice issued on 04 September 2024 allowed a reply until 13 September 2024, yet the application was rejected on 12 September 2024. The rejection order was quashed and set aside, subject to the applicant producing the required documents. The amendment application and the show cause notice were left to be considered in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763928 Premature rejection of a GST registration amendment application, before expiry of the time given to furnish additional documents, violated natural justice because it deprived the applicant of a fair opportunity to respond. The Delhi HC found that the notice issued on 04 September 2024 allowed a reply until 13 September 2024, yet the application was rejected on 12 September 2024. The rejection order was quashed and set aside, subject to the applicant producing the required documents. The amendment application and the show cause notice were left to be considered in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763928