<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1514 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763934</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner to file an application for revocation of GST registration cancellation under Section 30(2) of CGST Act, 2017 within two weeks. The registration was cancelled due to non-filing of GST returns for six continuous months. Following the precedent in an identical case, the court disposed of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to seek revocation through proper statutory remedy rather than continuing with the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1514 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763934</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner to file an application for revocation of GST registration cancellation under Section 30(2) of CGST Act, 2017 within two weeks. The registration was cancelled due to non-filing of GST returns for six continuous months. Following the precedent in an identical case, the court disposed of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to seek revocation through proper statutory remedy rather than continuing with the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>