<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1516 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763936</link>
    <description>Pending constitution of the Tribunal, the Court accepted that the pre-deposit required for continuation of stay of the first appellate order should be reduced in line with the later revenue notification. It held that deposit of 10% of the remaining disputed tax was sufficient for the impugned order to remain stayed, and the writ petition was disposed of on that modified condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1516 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763936</link>
      <description>Pending constitution of the Tribunal, the Court accepted that the pre-deposit required for continuation of stay of the first appellate order should be reduced in line with the later revenue notification. It held that deposit of 10% of the remaining disputed tax was sufficient for the impugned order to remain stayed, and the writ petition was disposed of on that modified condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>