<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39973</link>
    <description>A certificate under Article 133(1)(a) was incompetent where the dispute concerned interpretation of a taxing provision and raised an issue incapable of valuation. The appeal could not therefore proceed on that certificate, and the certificate was revoked. Because the High Court had not considered whether the matter satisfied Article 133(1)(c), that question was remitted for fresh examination by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39973</link>
      <description>A certificate under Article 133(1)(a) was incompetent where the dispute concerned interpretation of a taxing provision and raised an issue incapable of valuation. The appeal could not therefore proceed on that certificate, and the certificate was revoked. Because the High Court had not considered whether the matter satisfied Article 133(1)(c), that question was remitted for fresh examination by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>