https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459823 Proceedings under the amended benami regime could not be sustained where the underlying transactions were admittedly completed before 25 October 2016. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Ganpati Dealcom and an earlier Bombay High Court view, the Court found no basis to uphold the provisional attachment, reference, or confiscation proceedings on those admitted facts. The impugned attachment and connected proceedings were therefore quashed. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:58:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459823 Proceedings under the amended benami regime could not be sustained where the underlying transactions were admittedly completed before 25 October 2016. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Ganpati Dealcom and an earlier Bombay High Court view, the Court found no basis to uphold the provisional attachment, reference, or confiscation proceedings on those admitted facts. The impugned attachment and connected proceedings were therefore quashed. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459823