<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1675 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459833</link>
    <description>The HC upheld that royalty/interconnect service charge receipts paid to a non-resident telecom operator do not attract accrual-based taxation in India where payment circumstances mirror the precedent, and the factual position that tax was not deductible on such payments was unchallenged. The court found no infirmity in the impugned orders, applying the earlier authority and dismissing the challenge to the assessment treatment of those cross-border telecom payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1675 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459833</link>
      <description>The HC upheld that royalty/interconnect service charge receipts paid to a non-resident telecom operator do not attract accrual-based taxation in India where payment circumstances mirror the precedent, and the factual position that tax was not deductible on such payments was unchallenged. The court found no infirmity in the impugned orders, applying the earlier authority and dismissing the challenge to the assessment treatment of those cross-border telecom payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>