https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459834 The Karnataka HC dismissed the appeal, affirming that interconnect service charges do not constitute "royalty." The court aligned with a previous decision by a Co-ordinate Bench in ITA No. 160/2015, which determined that payments to non-resident telecom operators for interconnect services are not subject to tax as royalty. The judgment upheld the ITAT's finding that tax is not deductible on such payments, confirming no error in the earlier ruling. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:58:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459834 The Karnataka HC dismissed the appeal, affirming that interconnect service charges do not constitute "royalty." The court aligned with a previous decision by a Co-ordinate Bench in ITA No. 160/2015, which determined that payments to non-resident telecom operators for interconnect services are not subject to tax as royalty. The judgment upheld the ITAT's finding that tax is not deductible on such payments, confirming no error in the earlier ruling. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459834