<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Travel Expenses Partly Allowed, Cash Credits Unexplained, Delayed PF/ESIC Disallowed, Interest Deduction Allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84400</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses due to lack of documentary evidence establishing exclusive business purpose. Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were confirmed as the assessee failed to prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed PF/ESIC contributions was upheld following jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision. However, disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) for interest was deleted as the assessee demonstrated availability of sufficient interest-free funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=785051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Travel Expenses Partly Allowed, Cash Credits Unexplained, Delayed PF/ESIC Disallowed, Interest Deduction Allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84400</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses due to lack of documentary evidence establishing exclusive business purpose. Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were confirmed as the assessee failed to prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed PF/ESIC contributions was upheld following jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision. However, disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) for interest was deleted as the assessee demonstrated availability of sufficient interest-free funds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>