<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39959</link>
    <description>A spouse or minor child of an individual assessee qualifies as a dependant under the amended definition without proving actual financial dependence; accordingly, the wife&#039;s expenditure is includible in the individual&#039;s taxable expenditure. The separate treatment of individuals and Hindu undivided families does not import an HUF-related qualification into an individual&#039;s assessment. The distinction does not violate equality principles, and the levy falls within residuary legislative power. Reassessment notices remain valid where information on the wife&#039;s expenditure was received within the prescribed four-year period and independently supports reopening under the applicable provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39959</link>
      <description>A spouse or minor child of an individual assessee qualifies as a dependant under the amended definition without proving actual financial dependence; accordingly, the wife&#039;s expenditure is includible in the individual&#039;s taxable expenditure. The separate treatment of individuals and Hindu undivided families does not import an HUF-related qualification into an individual&#039;s assessment. The distinction does not violate equality principles, and the levy falls within residuary legislative power. Reassessment notices remain valid where information on the wife&#039;s expenditure was received within the prescribed four-year period and independently supports reopening under the applicable provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>