https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84380 The CESTAT held that the agreements between the appellant (a builder/developer) and prospective buyers for construction of residential units are to be treated as works contracts, which were not taxable prior to 1.7.2010. Even if classified as "construction of complex" services, abatement would apply, making them composite works contracts. The demand of service tax is time-barred and not sustainable. The penalty on the appellant firm's partner u/s 78A is also not sustainable since the main demand is set aside. The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order. en-us Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84380 The CESTAT held that the agreements between the appellant (a builder/developer) and prospective buyers for construction of residential units are to be treated as works contracts, which were not taxable prior to 1.7.2010. Even if classified as "construction of complex" services, abatement would apply, making them composite works contracts. The demand of service tax is time-barred and not sustainable. The penalty on the appellant firm's partner u/s 78A is also not sustainable since the main demand is set aside. The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order. Highlights Service Tax Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:21 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84380