<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39954</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 confined excise and countervailing duties to liquor imported, exported, transported, manufactured, cultivated, collected, or issued from a distillery, brewery, or warehouse as authorised by the Act. The rule-making power under section 62 extended only to carrying out the Act and regulating licences and permits, and did not authorise a fresh levy by notification or licence conditions on liquor not actually lifted from the warehouse. A taxing burden cannot be created by subordinate legislation without clear statutory authority. The impugned notification and the resulting demand notices were therefore invalid and not authorised by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39954</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 confined excise and countervailing duties to liquor imported, exported, transported, manufactured, cultivated, collected, or issued from a distillery, brewery, or warehouse as authorised by the Act. The rule-making power under section 62 extended only to carrying out the Act and regulating licences and permits, and did not authorise a fresh levy by notification or licence conditions on liquor not actually lifted from the warehouse. A taxing burden cannot be created by subordinate legislation without clear statutory authority. The impugned notification and the resulting demand notices were therefore invalid and not authorised by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>