https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763856 The Calcutta HC addressed a jurisdictional challenge against an order under the Finance Act, 1994, post-CGST Act, 2017 enforcement. The petitioners argued the order was unenforceable due to the CGST Act's provisions. The court acknowledged the issue and granted an unconditional stay on the order, contingent on a Rs. 50,000 deposit by the petitioners. This stay remains until the writ petition is resolved. The court permitted the filing of affidavits post-vacation, maintaining the interim order pending further proceedings. en-us Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763856 The Calcutta HC addressed a jurisdictional challenge against an order under the Finance Act, 1994, post-CGST Act, 2017 enforcement. The petitioners argued the order was unenforceable due to the CGST Act's provisions. The court acknowledged the issue and granted an unconditional stay on the order, contingent on a Rs. 50,000 deposit by the petitioners. This stay remains until the writ petition is resolved. The court permitted the filing of affidavits post-vacation, maintaining the interim order pending further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763856