<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1240 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459812</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi upheld contraventions under FERA sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) involving unauthorized foreign exchange transactions with a non-resident. The appellant received and distributed amounts without RBI authorization through an Abu Dhabi resident. Despite the appellant&#039;s retracted confession, the Tribunal found corroborating witness statements and documentary evidence reliable. The Adjudicating Officer was held not bound by Indian Evidence Act provisions. Penalties and confiscation under section 63 were deemed proportionate to contraventions. The Tribunal confirmed the original order without modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1240 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459812</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi upheld contraventions under FERA sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) involving unauthorized foreign exchange transactions with a non-resident. The appellant received and distributed amounts without RBI authorization through an Abu Dhabi resident. Despite the appellant&#039;s retracted confession, the Tribunal found corroborating witness statements and documentary evidence reliable. The Adjudicating Officer was held not bound by Indian Evidence Act provisions. Penalties and confiscation under section 63 were deemed proportionate to contraventions. The Tribunal confirmed the original order without modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>