<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459813</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay quashed a provisional attachment order and a reference order, aligning with an SC judgment that certain provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, apply prospectively. The court instructed authorities to withdraw all related criminal prosecutions and attachment orders, adhering to the SC&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459813</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay quashed a provisional attachment order and a reference order, aligning with an SC judgment that certain provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, apply prospectively. The court instructed authorities to withdraw all related criminal prosecutions and attachment orders, adhering to the SC&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>