<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459811</link>
    <description>Where the dispute concerns the chargeability of an activity to service tax, the appellate scheme under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Sections 35G and 35L(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 places the matter within the Supreme Court&#039;s jurisdiction and not the High Court&#039;s. A contemporaneous CBEC circular is noted as consistent with that position. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable before the High Court and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459811</link>
      <description>Where the dispute concerns the chargeability of an activity to service tax, the appellate scheme under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Sections 35G and 35L(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 places the matter within the Supreme Court&#039;s jurisdiction and not the High Court&#039;s. A contemporaneous CBEC circular is noted as consistent with that position. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable before the High Court and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>