<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (12) TMI 42 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39951</link>
    <description>An application for calling for a statement of the case after rule has been issued should not be rejected without recorded reasons. The Court held that a non-speaking order does not disclose the basis for declining relief and is therefore unsustainable where the matter has already progressed to the stage of rule. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (12) TMI 42 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39951</link>
      <description>An application for calling for a statement of the case after rule has been issued should not be rejected without recorded reasons. The Court held that a non-speaking order does not disclose the basis for declining relief and is therefore unsustainable where the matter has already progressed to the stage of rule. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>