https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763776 The appeal became infructuous because later developments and efflux of time removed any practical relief from the challenge to the administrative order. The High Court noted that the writ petitioner had shifted premises after the earlier order directing quashing of the excise authority's decision and acceptance of the renewal application, and the impugned order did not identify the premises that were the subject of the writ proceedings. As the factual matrix had changed, the appellate challenge no longer had practical efficacy, so the Court declined to examine the substantive issues and dismissed the appeal as moot, disposing of pending applications. en-us Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:30:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763776 The appeal became infructuous because later developments and efflux of time removed any practical relief from the challenge to the administrative order. The High Court noted that the writ petitioner had shifted premises after the earlier order directing quashing of the excise authority's decision and acceptance of the renewal application, and the impugned order did not identify the premises that were the subject of the writ proceedings. As the factual matrix had changed, the appellate challenge no longer had practical efficacy, so the Court declined to examine the substantive issues and dismissed the appeal as moot, disposing of pending applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763776