https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763792 Preventive detention against a person already in judicial custody requires the detaining authority to show, on cogent material, a reasoned satisfaction that release on bail is likely and that detention is necessary to prevent future prejudicial activity. Here, repeated bail applications had already been rejected by the trial court, sessions court and High Court, yet the authority recorded only a bare possibility of release without supporting material. That demonstrated non-application of mind, and the detention order was held liable to be quashed. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Dec 2024 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763792 Preventive detention against a person already in judicial custody requires the detaining authority to show, on cogent material, a reasoned satisfaction that release on bail is likely and that detention is necessary to prevent future prejudicial activity. Here, repeated bail applications had already been rejected by the trial court, sessions court and High Court, yet the authority recorded only a bare possibility of release without supporting material. That demonstrated non-application of mind, and the detention order was held liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763792