https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763814 HC held respondent-authorities should have continued hearings on original show-cause notices but, mistakingly believing earlier proceedings were quashed, issued fresh de novo notices. Rather than quashing the impugned notices or reviving earlier ones, the petitioner is relegated to file replies to the new notices. The Court noted the earlier direction to complete proceedings within three months remained unfulfilled after two years. The interim restraint on respondents issuing further advisories or summons to the petitioner's buyers in connection with the pending notices is continued. Petition disposed. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 14:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763814 HC held respondent-authorities should have continued hearings on original show-cause notices but, mistakingly believing earlier proceedings were quashed, issued fresh de novo notices. Rather than quashing the impugned notices or reviving earlier ones, the petitioner is relegated to file replies to the new notices. The Court noted the earlier direction to complete proceedings within three months remained unfulfilled after two years. The interim restraint on respondents issuing further advisories or summons to the petitioner's buyers in connection with the pending notices is continued. Petition disposed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763814