<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1396 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763816</link>
    <description>HC held that the appellate authority&#039;s dismissal of the revocation application was unsustainable and violated principles of natural justice because no adequate reasons were assigned. The court found the inspected site conformed with the original registration disclosures, undermining allegations about incorrect address and invoices. Orders dated 29 Feb 2024 and 30 May 2024, which dismissed the revocation application, were quashed and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1396 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763816</link>
      <description>HC held that the appellate authority&#039;s dismissal of the revocation application was unsustainable and violated principles of natural justice because no adequate reasons were assigned. The court found the inspected site conformed with the original registration disclosures, undermining allegations about incorrect address and invoices. Orders dated 29 Feb 2024 and 30 May 2024, which dismissed the revocation application, were quashed and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>