<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1970 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459783</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed appeals challenging termination orders of Class III and IV government employees. The appointments were made without following mandatory circular procedures issued by Bihar Government in 1980 for non-discriminatory selection process. Despite serving 10-20 years, petitioners could not claim regularization under Umadevi precedent as their initial appointments were illegal and void ab initio. The State Committee found appointments made by Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer were unlawful, and petitioners failed to establish genuineness of their appointments. The court held that illegal appointments cannot be sanctified through long service duration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 12:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1970 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459783</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed appeals challenging termination orders of Class III and IV government employees. The appointments were made without following mandatory circular procedures issued by Bihar Government in 1980 for non-discriminatory selection process. Despite serving 10-20 years, petitioners could not claim regularization under Umadevi precedent as their initial appointments were illegal and void ab initio. The State Committee found appointments made by Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer were unlawful, and petitioners failed to establish genuineness of their appointments. The court held that illegal appointments cannot be sanctified through long service duration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>