<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1292 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459769</link>
    <description>Before winding up a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989, the statutory authorities must meaningfully examine rehabilitation and revival proposals and follow the prescribed sequence for considering a viable scheme. Where draft or revised rehabilitation proposals are not properly considered, a winding-up direction cannot be sustained. The decision is also invalid if the company is not given an effective opportunity of hearing, including where notice was sent to a wrong address and no meaningful chance was afforded to present its case. The winding-up order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration of revival in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 13:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1292 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459769</link>
      <description>Before winding up a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989, the statutory authorities must meaningfully examine rehabilitation and revival proposals and follow the prescribed sequence for considering a viable scheme. Where draft or revised rehabilitation proposals are not properly considered, a winding-up direction cannot be sustained. The decision is also invalid if the company is not given an effective opportunity of hearing, including where notice was sent to a wrong address and no meaningful chance was afforded to present its case. The winding-up order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration of revival in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>