<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763729</link>
    <description>Under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the CrPC applies to Special Court proceedings except where the Act provides , so an order confiscating property is treated as an order disposing of property and the appeal against it was maintainable under the corresponding CrPC appellate remedy. Confiscation is confined to property involved in money-laundering or used in the offence; where provisional attachment had already been lifted and the appellant purchased the properties thereafter, confiscation of those properties was unsustainable. The HC therefore set aside the confiscation order insofar as it related to the appellant&#039;s properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763729</link>
      <description>Under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the CrPC applies to Special Court proceedings except where the Act provides , so an order confiscating property is treated as an order disposing of property and the appeal against it was maintainable under the corresponding CrPC appellate remedy. Confiscation is confined to property involved in money-laundering or used in the offence; where provisional attachment had already been lifted and the appellant purchased the properties thereafter, confiscation of those properties was unsustainable. The HC therefore set aside the confiscation order insofar as it related to the appellant&#039;s properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>