https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763766 HC dismissed the appeal and refused admission, upholding AO, FAA and Tribunal findings that deposits made after the 8 Nov 2016 demonetization notification constituted unexplained income under s.69A. The assessee's post-notice explanation, based on bank information under s.143(6), was held to be no explanation; the source and nature of the sums remained unestablished, justifying the AO's conclusion of unexplained money. The court found no substantial question of law warranting admission of the appeal. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2025 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763766 HC dismissed the appeal and refused admission, upholding AO, FAA and Tribunal findings that deposits made after the 8 Nov 2016 demonetization notification constituted unexplained income under s.69A. The assessee's post-notice explanation, based on bank information under s.143(6), was held to be no explanation; the source and nature of the sums remained unestablished, justifying the AO's conclusion of unexplained money. The court found no substantial question of law warranting admission of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763766