https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459756 Delhi HC dismissed writ petitions seeking direction to CCI to frame preliminary jurisdiction issues before deciding cases on merits. The court held it would be futile to require CCI to re-decide jurisdiction as a preliminary matter. While HC has jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct CCI on preliminary issues, writ petitions are not maintainable as of right for framing preliminary issues before statutory bodies. The court noted Section 36 of the Act empowers CCI to regulate its own procedure. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459756 Delhi HC dismissed writ petitions seeking direction to CCI to frame preliminary jurisdiction issues before deciding cases on merits. The court held it would be futile to require CCI to re-decide jurisdiction as a preliminary matter. While HC has jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct CCI on preliminary issues, writ petitions are not maintainable as of right for framing preliminary issues before statutory bodies. The court noted Section 36 of the Act empowers CCI to regulate its own procedure. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459756