https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459757 Delhi HC dismissed petitioner's challenge against Competition Commission of India's rejection of his application for Expert position in law. Court held that CCI was justified in treating the application as incomplete due to lack of supporting documents demonstrating qualifications and work experience as required. Petitioner's argument that Bar Council enrollment certificate from 2006 was sufficient proof of legal practice was rejected. Court ruled that employers have prerogative to stipulate educational qualifications and selection criteria, and applications without required supporting documents can be legitimately rejected as incomplete. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459757 Delhi HC dismissed petitioner's challenge against Competition Commission of India's rejection of his application for Expert position in law. Court held that CCI was justified in treating the application as incomplete due to lack of supporting documents demonstrating qualifications and work experience as required. Petitioner's argument that Bar Council enrollment certificate from 2006 was sufficient proof of legal practice was rejected. Court ruled that employers have prerogative to stipulate educational qualifications and selection criteria, and applications without required supporting documents can be legitimately rejected as incomplete. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459757