https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459758 Delhi HC held that CCI has locus standi to appeal orders affecting its statutory functions, including those staying Director General investigations under Competition Act, 2002. CCI, being a body corporate with power to sue and be sued, can represent itself in appeals as investigation forms part of its regulatory jurisdiction. The court noted that while Single Judge initially allowed investigation but stayed final orders, the matter remained pending with counters yet to be filed. HC disposed of the appeal, ruling that CCI could file necessary counter-affidavits and seek vacation of the stay order through proper proceedings before the Single Judge rather than requiring appellate intervention at that stage. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459758 Delhi HC held that CCI has locus standi to appeal orders affecting its statutory functions, including those staying Director General investigations under Competition Act, 2002. CCI, being a body corporate with power to sue and be sued, can represent itself in appeals as investigation forms part of its regulatory jurisdiction. The court noted that while Single Judge initially allowed investigation but stayed final orders, the matter remained pending with counters yet to be filed. HC disposed of the appeal, ruling that CCI could file necessary counter-affidavits and seek vacation of the stay order through proper proceedings before the Single Judge rather than requiring appellate intervention at that stage. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459758